The best performing sector as of midday Wednesday is the Materials sector, higher by 1.3%. Within that group, Albemarle Corp. (Symbol: ALB) and Freeport-McMoran Copper & Gold (Symbol: FCX) are two large stocks leading the way, showing a gain of 7.7% and 3.6%, respectively. Among the high volume ETFs, one ETF closely following materials stocks is the Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (Symbol: XLB), which is up 1.0% on the day, and up 9.18% year-to-date. Albemarle Corp., meanwhile, is down 20.40% year-to-date, and Freeport-McMoran Copper & Gold is up 20.67% year-to-date. Combined, ALB and FCX make up approximately 5.9% of the underlying holdings of XLB.
The next best performing sector is the Energy sector, higher by 1.1%. Among large Energy stocks, APA Corp (Symbol: APA) and Valero Energy Corp (Symbol: VLO) are the most notable, showing a gain of 2.6% and 2.2%, respectively. One ETF closely tracking Energy stocks is the Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE), which is up 1.2% in midday trading, and up 2.67% on a year-to-date basis. APA Corp, meanwhile, is down 13.63% year-to-date, and Valero Energy Corp is up 16.91% year-to-date. Combined, APA and VLO make up approximately 3.7% of the underlying holdings of XLE.
Comparing these stocks and ETFs on a trailing twelve month basis, below is a relative stock price performance chart, with each of the symbols shown in a different color as labeled in the legend at the bottom:
Here's a snapshot of how the S&P 500 components within the various sectors are faring in afternoon trading on Wednesday. As you can see, four sectors are up on the day, while five sectors are down.
Sector | % Change |
---|---|
Materials | +1.3% |
Energy | +1.1% |
Consumer Products | +0.8% |
Technology & Communications | +0.4% |
Services | -0.1% |
Industrial | -0.1% |
Financial | -0.5% |
Utilities | -0.7% |
Healthcare | -1.2% |
10 ETFs With Stocks That Insiders Are Buying »
Also see:
Top Ten Hedge Funds Holding DUDE
HNGR Split History
DDR Options Chain
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.