In afternoon trading on Friday, Healthcare stocks are the worst performing sector, showing a 1.3% loss. Within that group, Gilead Sciences Inc (Symbol: GILD) and Bristol Myers Squibb Co. (Symbol: BMY) are two of the day’s laggards, showing a loss of 4.0% and 3.3%, respectively. Among healthcare ETFs, one ETF following the sector is the Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (Symbol: XLV), which is down 1.0% on the day, and down 1.01% year-to-date. Gilead Sciences Inc, meanwhile, is up 20.72% year-to-date, and Bristol Myers Squibb Co., is down 13.73% year-to-date. Combined, GILD and BMY make up approximately 4.8% of the underlying holdings of XLV.
The next worst performing sector is the Materials sector, showing a 1.0% loss. Among large Materials stocks, Albemarle Corp. (Symbol: ALB) and Masco Corp. (Symbol: MAS) are the most notable, showing a loss of 3.9% and 2.5%, respectively. One ETF closely tracking Materials stocks is the Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB), which is down 1.0% in midday trading, and up 9.56% on a year-to-date basis. Albemarle Corp., meanwhile, is down 16.15% year-to-date, and Masco Corp., is down 8.50% year-to-date. ALB makes up approximately 1.1% of the underlying holdings of XLB.
Comparing these stocks and ETFs on a trailing twelve month basis, below is a relative stock price performance chart, with each of the symbols shown in a different color as labeled in the legend at the bottom:
Here's a snapshot of how the S&P 500 components within the various sectors are faring in afternoon trading on Friday. As you can see, one sector is up on the day, while eight sectors are down.
Sector | % Change |
---|---|
Energy | +0.6% |
Financial | -0.4% |
Utilities | -0.5% |
Services | -0.6% |
Industrial | -0.7% |
Consumer Products | -0.8% |
Technology & Communications | -0.8% |
Materials | -1.0% |
Healthcare | -1.3% |
25 Dividend Giants Widely Held By ETFs »
Also see:
Dividend History
SPXU Videos
CWAY Historical Stock Prices
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.