Musk presses forward with federal worker threats

musk-presses-forward-with-federal-worker-threats

Updated / Tuesday, 25 Feb 2025 11:38

Demonstrators hold signs in support of federal workers outside of the L'Enfant metro station in Washington, DC

Demonstrators hold signs in support of federal workers outside of the L’Enfant metro station in Washington, DC

A defiant threat by Elon Musk warning that federal employees will be given “a second chance” to respond to his email asking them to justify their jobs or risk termination is likely to spark another round of confusion across the US government.

Mr Musk’s warning came after Trump administration officials told federal workers they did not have to respond to his weekend email that demanded they summarize their accomplishments of the past week.

Failure to reply would be considered a resignation, Mr Musk had said.

But while some federal agencies such as the US Treasury Department told their workers to comply with the request, others like the Pentagon did not. As his midnight deadline approached last night, the US Office of Personnel Management ultimately told agencies their workers could ignore the email.

Mr Musk, the billionaire CEO of Tesla and SpaceX who has been tasked by President Donald Trump to lead a radical downsizing of the federal government, seemed undeterred.

“Subject to the discretion of the president, they will be given another chance. Failure to respond a second time will result in termination,” he wrote on X.

Mr Musk’s actions and the pushback he saw from federal agencies cracked open new fissures within Mr Trump’s nascent administration and raised questions about the limits of Mr Musk’s authority.

Even after OPM’s guidance, which urged employees not to share classified or sensitive information in responding to Mr Musk, some agency officials still nudged their employees to answer the email.

Elon Musk said workers who fail to respond to his email will be fired

A senior manager at the General Services Administration, which manages federal buildings, told employees that the agency was still encouraging workers to respond even though it was voluntary, according to a GSA source.

Similarly, the acting director of OPM itself sent an email to the agency’s staff that said responding with bullet points was voluntary “but strongly encouraged.”

Meanwhile, the Department of Health and Human Services advised employees that if they chose to reply, they should keep their responses general in nature and they should refrain from identifying specific drugs or contracts they are working on, according to an email reviewed by Reuters.


Read More:
When will mass US government firings show up in data?
Some US agencies tell workers not to reply to Musk’s email
Nearly 10,000 fired as Trump and Musk step up cuts


“Assume that what you write will be read by malign foreign actors and tailor your response accordingly,” the email said.

Mr Musk’s downsizing initiative, powered by his so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has led to the layoff of more than 20,000 workers. The administration has separately offered buyouts to 75,000 employees.

The federal workforce numbers about 2.3 million.

The headquarters of the EPA in Washington – the US federal workforce stands at around 2.3 million

Mr Musk’s slash-and-burn approach has rippled into the wider US economy as well, forcing companies that do business with the government to lay off workers and defer payments to vendors.

Since taking office on 20 January, Mr Trump has frozen billions of dollars in foreign assistance and effectively dismantled the US Agency for International Development, which administers some 60% of US foreign assistance, stranding medicine and food in warehouses.

In some cases, the government has scrambled to rehire workers who perform critical functions like nuclear weapons oversight and bird flu response.

Yesterday, a group of labour unions that have asked a federal judge to stop the mass firings updated their lawsuit to request that Mr Musk’s threatening email be ruled illegal.

At the same time, a federal judge blocked the DOGE team from accessing sensitive data maintained by the Education Department and the OPM.

Unlike Cabinet appointees and appointees to head up independent federal agencies, Mr Musk’s appointment required no approval by the US Senate.

More stories on

Leave a Reply